promptfoo vs RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic
Side-by-side comparison built from DeepYard's structured catalog. Content updated Aug 21, 2026.
Direct Answer
promptfoo suits teams needing open-source access, testing focus, and 24,450 GitHub stars in current listing data. RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic suits teams needing open-source access, debugging focus, and 133,530 GitHub stars in current listing data. This summary reflects catalog metadata only for decision support, not independent testing.
What this comparison weighs
- Pricing and free-tier availability
- License model and deployment fit
- GitHub adoption and contributor depth
- Catalog tags, integrations, and supported workflows
| Metric | promptfoo | RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Stars | 24.4K | 133.5K |
| Contributors | 318 | 95 |
| Last Commit | Aug 21, 2026 | Aug 22, 2026 |
| Open Issues | 515 | 14 |
| License | open-source | open-source |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Category | dev-tools | dev-tools |
| Trending | No | No |
Choose promptfoo if you need
- • promptfoo stands out for Testing workflows that are not listed for RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic.
- • promptfoo is the stronger pick when Openai matters because that capability is listed only on its profile.
- • promptfoo has a larger visible contributor base (318 vs 95).
Choose RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic if you need
- • RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic stands out for Debugging workflows that are not listed for promptfoo.
- • RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic is the stronger pick when Any Rag Pipeline matters because that capability is listed only on its profile.
- • RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic shows broader GitHub adoption with 133,530 stars versus 24,450 for promptfoo.
Meaningful differences
- • Workflow emphasis: promptfoo highlights Testing, while RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic highlights Debugging.
- • GitHub adoption: promptfoo shows 24,450 stars versus 133,530 for RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic.
- • Contributor count: promptfoo lists 318 contributors and RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic lists 95.
Shared capabilities
- • Evaluation
Shared Tags
Only in promptfoo
Only in RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic
Limitations and evidence
- • DeepYard compares structured public metadata; this is not an independent benchmark unless a test record is shown.
- • Signals such as stars, contributors, and last commit indicate public activity, not purchase fit or runtime quality.
- • Pricing and feature coverage reflect the stored listing snapshot and may lag vendor changes between refreshes.
Source links
About promptfoo
promptfoo is an open-source tool for testing, evaluating, and red-teaming LLM applications. Run automated evaluations across multiple models and prompts, compare outputs side-by-side, detect regressions, and test for security vulnerabilities. Supports custom assertions, CI/CD integration, and model-graded evaluations.
View full listingAbout RAG Failure Diagnostics Clinic
A diagnostic tool that identifies why RAG pipelines produce poor results. It tests for common failure modes: irrelevant retrieval, missing context, hallucination over context, chunking issues, and embedding quality problems. Provides a structured report with specific fix recommendations for each detected issue. Essential for debugging production RAG systems. Part of the awesome-llm-apps collection.
View full listing