Official MCP Servers vs Screenpipe MCP
Side-by-side comparison built from DeepYard's structured catalog. Content updated Aug 21, 2026.
Direct Answer
Official MCP Servers suits teams needing open-source access, web search focus, and 89,768 GitHub stars in current listing data. Screenpipe MCP suits teams needing freemium $25/month, streamable http focus, and 21,163 GitHub stars in current listing data. This summary reflects catalog metadata only for decision support, not independent testing.
What this comparison weighs
- Pricing and free-tier availability
- License model and deployment fit
- GitHub adoption and contributor depth
- Catalog tags, integrations, and supported workflows
| Metric | Official MCP Servers | Screenpipe MCP |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Stars | 89.8K | 21.2K |
| Contributors | 426 | 154 |
| Last Commit | Aug 20, 2026 | Aug 22, 2026 |
| Open Issues | 533 | 101 |
| License | open-source | source-available |
| Pricing | open-source | freemium |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Category | mcp-servers | mcp-servers |
| Trending | No | No |
Choose Official MCP Servers if you need
- • Official MCP Servers is the better fit when you need open-source licensing instead of source-available terms.
- • Official MCP Servers is the stronger pick when Web Search matters because that capability is listed only on its profile.
- • Official MCP Servers shows broader GitHub adoption with 89,768 stars versus 21,163 for Screenpipe MCP.
Choose Screenpipe MCP if you need
- • Screenpipe MCP stands out for Streamable Http workflows that are not listed for Official MCP Servers.
- • Screenpipe MCP is the stronger pick when Screen History Search matters because that capability is listed only on its profile.
- • Screenpipe MCP is the cleaner fit if you specifically need Local First workflows from the catalog tags.
Meaningful differences
- • Pricing model: Official MCP Servers is listed as open-source, while Screenpipe MCP is listed as freemium from $25/month.
- • License: Official MCP Servers uses open-source, while Screenpipe MCP uses source-available.
- • Workflow emphasis: Official MCP Servers highlights Stdio, while Screenpipe MCP highlights Streamable Http.
- • GitHub adoption: Official MCP Servers shows 89,768 stars versus 21,163 for Screenpipe MCP.
- • Contributor count: Official MCP Servers lists 426 contributors and Screenpipe MCP lists 154.
Shared capabilities
- • Mcp
Shared Tags
Only in Official MCP Servers
Only in Screenpipe MCP
Limitations and evidence
- • DeepYard compares structured public metadata; this is not an independent benchmark unless a test record is shown.
- • Signals such as stars, contributors, and last commit indicate public activity, not purchase fit or runtime quality.
- • Pricing and feature coverage reflect the stored listing snapshot and may lag vendor changes between refreshes.
Source links
About Official MCP Servers
The official collection of Model Context Protocol servers maintained by Anthropic. Includes reference implementations for Brave Search, Google Drive, Google Maps, PostgreSQL, Puppeteer, Slack, Sentry, and more. Each server is a standalone package that can be installed independently. The canonical starting point for MCP integration.
View full listingAbout Screenpipe MCP
Screenpipe MCP connects AI agents to a locally recorded work history. Its tools search OCR, accessibility, input, and audio records; summarize application activity; find meetings; inspect UI elements; and export recorded video while keeping the underlying screenpipe data on the user's machine.
View full listing