Activepieces vs Firecrawl
Side-by-side comparison built from DeepYard's structured catalog. Content updated Aug 21, 2026.
Direct Answer
Activepieces suits teams needing freemium free tier, automation focus, and 23,974 GitHub stars in current listing data. Firecrawl suits teams needing freemium free tier, web scraping focus, and 170,656 GitHub stars in current listing data. This summary reflects catalog metadata only for decision support, not independent testing.
What this comparison weighs
- Pricing and free-tier availability
- License model and deployment fit
- GitHub adoption and contributor depth
- Catalog tags, integrations, and supported workflows
| Metric | Activepieces | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Stars | 24.0K | 170.7K |
| Contributors | 355 | 162 |
| Last Commit | Aug 21, 2026 | Aug 22, 2026 |
| Open Issues | 489 | 546 |
| License | open-source | open-source |
| Pricing | freemium | freemium |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Category | dev-tools | dev-tools |
| Trending | No | No |
Choose Activepieces if you need
- • Activepieces stands out for Automation workflows that are not listed for Firecrawl.
- • Activepieces is the stronger pick when Slack matters because that capability is listed only on its profile.
- • Activepieces has a larger visible contributor base (355 vs 162).
Choose Firecrawl if you need
- • Firecrawl stands out for Web Scraping workflows that are not listed for Activepieces.
- • Firecrawl is the stronger pick when Langchain matters because that capability is listed only on its profile.
- • Firecrawl shows broader GitHub adoption with 170,656 stars versus 23,974 for Activepieces.
Meaningful differences
- • Workflow emphasis: Activepieces highlights Automation, while Firecrawl highlights Web Scraping.
- • GitHub adoption: Activepieces shows 23,974 stars versus 170,656 for Firecrawl.
- • Contributor count: Activepieces lists 355 contributors and Firecrawl lists 162.
Shared capabilities
- • No shared capabilities are explicitly listed in the stored metadata.
Shared Tags
Only in Activepieces
Only in Firecrawl
Limitations and evidence
- • DeepYard compares structured public metadata; this is not an independent benchmark unless a test record is shown.
- • Signals such as stars, contributors, and last commit indicate public activity, not purchase fit or runtime quality.
- • Pricing and feature coverage reflect the stored listing snapshot and may lag vendor changes between refreshes.
Source links
About Activepieces
Activepieces is an open-source workflow automation platform and Zapier alternative with a no-code visual builder, 280+ integrations (60% community-contributed), and the largest open-source MCP collection. All 280+ pieces are usable as MCP tools with Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf. Features loops, branches, auto-retries, native AI pieces, custom agent creation, TypeScript piece framework with hot-reloading, enterprise features (branding, approval workflows, human input via chat/forms), version control, and network-gapped deployment.
View full listingAbout Firecrawl
Firecrawl is a web scraping API that turns entire websites into clean, LLM-ready markdown or structured data. Handles JavaScript rendering, anti-bot bypassing, sitemaps, and recursive crawling. Provides scrape (single URL), crawl (entire site), map (discover URLs), and extract (structured data) endpoints. Essential infrastructure for RAG pipelines and AI agents that need web data.
View full listing